Over the past year, the Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The ...

Cal Lutheran’s Program Review provides an opportunity for a recurring all-inclusive assessment of a program for its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges, with the ultimate goal of ...

Reviews are thorough and require 12-18 months to complete. Brief descriptions of the individual process elements with linked guides and templates are provided below. A complete overview of the process ...

For effective long-range planning and continuous improvement, it is important to monitor the progress of a new degree program soon after implementation. All new academic degrees, options, and ...

SUNY mandates program review on a five to seven year cycle for all credit-bearing academic programs which are not programmatically accredited. A self-study document is prepared by the department ...

A department or program review provides an occasion to re-examine learning goals and course offerings, identify programmatic strengths and weaknesses, envision the future shape of the curriculum, ...

“Academic program reviews” have become a standard best practice in higher education’s accountability world. Every five years or so, a department brings in outside professors to critique how well — or ...

Regular, periodic reviews of academic degree programs provide a formal process for thorough, fact-based documentation and evaluation of the programs, the infrastructure supporting them, and the plans ...

Provide a space for departmental reflection on its achievement of its mission and contribution of department activities to the University’s strategic goals; Provide faculty and administrators, through ...

In a follow-up to their prior working paper, Brian Miller, William Blanks, and Brian Yagi published a review of 510(k) Third Party Review Program in the Journal of Medical Systems. In their article, ...