Federal court judges in New York and Michigan have offered split rulings on whether AI prompts seeking information from AI ...

A recent decision from Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York marks a watershed moment in the legal profession’s ...

ALBANY, N.Y. (NEWS10) — A new federal ruling is raising questions about how artificial intelligence could impact the legal ...

Judge Rakoff ruled that AI-generated information is not protected by attorney-client privilege if created independently by a ...

The article examines how attorneys can preserve the sacred protection of attorney-client privilege with the proliferation of ...

Opinion: For attorneys incorporating AI into their practice, the opinion in Heppner provides a roadmap for potentially protecting privilege, but one that requires intentional, measured construction.

AI chats are not authomatically protected. In U.S. v. Heppner, Claude conversations seized by the FBI were not attorney-client privileged or work product.

Opinion: Clients who want to use AI to assist their defense likely will find their efforts aren't protected from disclosure ...

The recent decision in United States v. Heppner, No. 25-cr-00503-JSR (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2026), underscores the need for ...

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in the legal sector and corporate operations, its implications for attorney-client privilege should be a rising concern for board members. AI ...

Q: We are in a civil case with others, suing a person who engaged in fraudulent misconduct. We share the same attorney who is trying to establish that the attorney-client privilege between this guy ...