Judge Rakoff ruled that AI-generated information is not protected by attorney-client privilege if created independently by a ...
A recent decision from Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York marks a watershed moment in the legal profession’s ...
As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in day-to-day life and in the legal field, in particular, thorny questions ...
Opinion: For attorneys incorporating AI into their practice, the opinion in Heppner provides a roadmap for potentially protecting privilege, but one that requires intentional, measured construction.
AI chats are not authomatically protected. In U.S. v. Heppner, Claude conversations seized by the FBI were not attorney-client privileged or work product.
Opinion: Clients who want to use AI to assist their defense likely will find their efforts aren't protected from disclosure ...
The policy behind the attorney-client privilege is to promote candid and open communication by clients to their attorneys without fear of disclosure. The attorney-client privilege only applies if the ...
The recent decision in United States v. Heppner, No. 25-cr-00503-JSR (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2026), underscores the need for ...
A frequent topic in the media these days is the attorney-client privilege. This is probably a consequence of the volume of high-profile legal controversies now making headlines and the comings and ...
This article discusses the issue of attorney-client privilege for unpaid attorney members of non-profit boards of directors. The question arises whether or not communications to and from the boards of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results